[Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper

[mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)]

It for sure looked like a solid piece of paper with strips of film exposed
to it IE a contact sheet. So that part of it as far as I go is not up for
grabs. I've seen and made thousands of them and know that the funny ones
look like. Like the ones from way over exposed and developed film where you
don't see any sprocket holes and so on. On this one you could.
But I'm not going to bring it up any more as there is nothing to show for
it. And the burden would be on us to  put up or shut up. So consider me
having shut up. Sooner or later it will surface as Google contact sheet
gobbles up the visual world. If its been a recorded image it will show up
there if not this year than the next.

- - from my iRabs.
Mark Rabiner
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Lottermoser George <imagist3 at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:20:51 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Gallery and the Puddle Jumper
> 
> 
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Richard Taylor wrote:
> 
>> Amen.  I think the only way to close this would be to show us--who know 
>> what
>> we saw--the contact sheet with only one jumper, or the contact sheet with
>> multiple different jumpers.
> 
>> On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> 
>>> Well if it didn't exist they shouldn't have put it in the show.
> 
> being that you saw this in a "scrapbook" show
> apparently edited by the artist himself
> is it possible
> that you saw a number of versions of the the same frame
> "scrapped into a book"
> (rather than a "contact sheet")
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information