Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X Pro-1 Conversion Comparison
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:14:22 -0700
References: <CF4EC0E7-06E3-4532-969A-34799D0FF8F7@comcast.net>

On Jun 26, 2012, at 8:43 PM, Richard Taylor wrote:

> Here are the results of four different conversion processes of one X Pro-1 
> shot.  All the images were exported from LR 4.1 as high quality JPGs.  
> 
> 1. Copy as DNG and import into LR 4.1
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rtaylor/PICKS/xpro-1/DSCF0261_DNG.jpg.html
> 
> 2. Copy without conversion from RAF file and import into LR 4.1
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rtaylor/PICKS/xpro-1/DSCF0261_RAF.jpg.html
> 
> 3. Process RAF file in Silky Pix RAW converter and import into LR 4.1.  
> The TIF file looks just the same opened directly in Photoshop as it does 
> here so the importation did not effect the file. 
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rtaylor/PICKS/xpro-1/DSCF0261_TIF.jpg.html
> 
> 4. And finally the in-camera JPG copied without conversion into LR 4.1.
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rtaylor/PICKS/xpro-1/DSCF0261_JPG.jpg.html
> 
> To me the in-camera JPG looks a bit over sharpened, but opinions can 
> differ on that.  It's really superior to any other process at the moment, 
> though.  Even the Silky Pix RAW converter doesn't come close.  
> 
> 
wonderful Dick, thank you,

Steve





> Regards, 
> 
> Dick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Fuji X Pro-1 Conversion Comparison)