Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The death of the silver gelatin prints
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:49:02 -0700
References: <33358043.1340166578927.JavaMail.root@elwamui-norfolk.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CAF8hL-EPiRQu9gSAZV_2kosG37fNRdPJfsqo2gSbnY9Ynrk-dw@mail.gmail.com>

Oh, and the gloss is less "annoying." The Z has a gloss optimizer which
really helps here, I think.

Although I have to say, there is something about that pure black in the
silver print that has a lot of appeal. Just slightly more appealing in that
case...

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Richard Man <richard at 
richardmanphoto.com>wrote:

> Quite a bit sharper (this is from the same file of course), better noise
> in the shadow and generally more contrast (macro and micro ?)
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Montie <montoid at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Just curious, better how?  More gloss, blacker blacks?
>> etc.
>>
>> Montie
>>
>> >>Overblown sensational title? Surely you jest? :-)
>>
>> Yes, a tad.
>>
>> Yes, I went for the premium option, even with Selenium toning (50% more
>> $).
>>
>> It's quite superb, just that Z+ Gloss Baryta is better. I was hoping they
>> would be equal.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Montie <montoid at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> > It's a Durst Theta 51. Was your image uploaded via Roes for their
>> > value RC print?  Not Great.  Try their custom printing on Ilfobrom
>> > Galerie Fiber (Baryta based) Semi Gloss...Superb, assuming the file
>> > is good in the first place.  300 dpi or better etc. Your subject
>> > title may be a tad overblown?
>> >
>> > Montie
>> >
>> >
>> > >>Folks might remember that I tried doing digital negative before. In
>> the
>> > end, unsuccessfully because my HP Z3100 is just not good for that
>> > particular type of task (digital negative for silver contact prints -
>> > apparently, it works great for digital negatives with alternative
>> process).
>> > Eventually when I have to replace the Z3100, I will probably get an
>> Epson
>> > and try the experiment again.
>> >
>> > Meanwhile, since I have to make some 17x22 prints for a couple gallery
>> > shows, I got a 8x10 sample print from Digital Silver where you upload
>> the
>> > digital file and they print it using some sort of LED laser and then
>> > processed in wet chemical.
>> >
>> > I make the same print on the Z. Comparing to the Z3100 printing on Gloss
>> > Baryta, it's no comparison, the inkjet print looks better in every way.
>> >
>> > So Z+Gloss Baryta it is.
>> >
>> > --
>> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
>
>


-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] The death of the silver gelatin prints)
In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie) ([Leica] The death of the silver gelatin prints)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The death of the silver gelatin prints)