Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Jim's thread on pixel-peepers / equipment molesters /...
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:38:29 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-EATaiEu77yfhOk1DEcCLA5Pd9RryjzbMLDgGLn_Hw7_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxuH6QCzdNWsZmOeoRFOnp5dxPPRGYn+N_7fvgnG3_pSgA@mail.gmail.com>
 
HCB was also born rich. That's why he could do what he did.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> He probably wouldn't have to balk at it, Leica would supply him one.
>
> I presume they supplied him the 40mm Minilux he used in his last years.
>
> I've read he was quite a gearhead.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://sonc.com/look/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Jim's thread on pixel-peepers / equipment molesters /...)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Jim's thread on pixel-peepers / equipment molesters /...)