Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:33:50 -0400
References: <CAMGHw9B=aWixmXOd4ESpQ3JEeNkKXZmpuCKStbxTSdMk7-vuHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4y7gyz_G=7ZwoX4CFrABP7mTeSVdw61icsxpNjbMRFnXpVVw@mail.gmail.com>
and that's reminiscent though slightly less cynical than the old
saying about the futures markets: How do you make a small fortune in
commodities? Start with a large fortune.
-rei
On 06/18/2012 08:46 PM, Robert Baron wrote:
> This reminds me of an instructional quote from my hero Elliott Erwitt:
> "To be a successful photographer you should first inherit a large
> amount of money". --Bob
> _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies:
Reply from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
In reply to:
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)