Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:52:57 -0500
References: <CAMGHw9B=aWixmXOd4ESpQ3JEeNkKXZmpuCKStbxTSdMk7-vuHw@mail.gmail.com> <E2DE03A5-8D17-487A-90A5-070AA6D35B6A@mac.com>

George,

Of course he cared about his tools. He chose them well and they served
him well. What I was talking about is this infernal pixel-peeping that
we see so much of on the LUG (and elsewhere) every day. Do you really
think HCB would really care if the Nikon 800E could resolve just a
whisker finer than the 800? Really? That's what I meant by WHO CARES.
OF COURSE we all choose the tools that we think are best for us. But
it's the picture that counts, not the camera or the lens.

Jim Laird

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:50 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> 
wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2012, at 3:24 PM, James Laird wrote:
>
>> WHO CARES?
>
> The artists and craftsmen and women care.
>
> Art and craft objects evolve out of countless choices.
> Choices of tools and materials among them.
> Every painter I've known has cared about his tools and materials.
> Every sculptor I've known has cared about his tools and materials.
> Every musician I've known has cared about his tools and materials.
> Every writer I've known has cared about his tools and materials.
> Every photographer I've known has cared about his tools and materials.
>
> HCB (and every other great or not-so-great)
> chose his tools, film, location, composition, focus, and moments of 
> exposure.
> They (we) choose our printers (whether humans or machines),
> papers, inks, developers, et al.
> Each choice is important, organic, fluid and subject to change;
> for aesthetic, conceptual, economic or other reasons.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)