Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Historically for photographers Leicas were cheap compared to their Hasselblads and Linhof's or Sinar's. - - from my iRabs. Mark Rabiner http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/springdays/ > From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 10:22:43 +1200 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Final Sobol Photos with MM Part II the beginning > > Ha ha, Leica cannot even supply core M lenses today! Look at the number of > people waiting from 35mm and 50mm Summilux's (and doubtless for 50mm AA as > well now), I have just cancelled an order from last July for a 75mm > APO-Summicron as there was no sign of one arriving soon ( a good used one > turned up). > > You would have to be quite a successful photographer to buy into the M > system from scratch IMO, it is not cheap and is it that much better in > output? I think so, but I do not regard it as value for money. In a > business > world that is not good enough... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > > And the camera is not a loaner the camera is something the photographer > went > out and bought with his/her hard earned inheritance. Then went out and > bought a lens too. Then used it for a critical job. And the results speak > for themselves. Then M10's fly off the shelves not just to rich guys. But > to > some noted figures in today's photography. Which makes for more rich guys. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information