Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Wow
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:58:44 +0200
References: <CAMGHw9BaKyOGAsi+cZQPNWOUxdaJ5y0iasB+Zxc=U2T7do5UtA@mail.gmail.com>

It's because there are apparently enough people out there willing to pay 
$7195 for a slowish 50mm lens, so why shouldn't Leica not charge it?

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Jun 2, 2012, at 6:16 PM, James Laird wrote:

> I'm sure this has been discussed before, but what's the reasoning
> behind the HUGE jump in price for the 50 Summicron ASPH. Went from
> $2295 to $7195 because of those four little letters! Even the 50
> Summilux ASPH is just $3995, so it's $3200 cheaper yet one full stop
> faster! By rights it should be priced at $8000 or more if you follow
> the logic. I don't get it. Wow.
> 
> Jim Laird
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Wow)