Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Endgadget on the MM
From: leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:50:56 -0700
References: <26657369.1338427776827.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net><80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9722E5312@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <699FA4AA-FD16-47D9-9293-516623E91D82@gmail.com>

I agree.  Much easier compensation on my Nikon that it was on my Canon.  Not 
perfect, but easier.  Now, the R10 would have been perfect.

Aram

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 7:02 PM
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] Endgadget on the MM

>
> On May 30, 2012, at 7:00 PM, John McMaster wrote:
>
>> I guess the difference is adaptors (wobbly) or Leitax, with the latter 
>> (and only way to fit to Nikon) I would expect no difference in 
>> Canon/Nikon.
>
>
> but there is a difference... in the linearity of exposure compensation.
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>>
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>>
>>>
>>> Where did you hear that? There can be some issue with exposure readings 
>>> but nothing wrong with focus...
>>>
>>
>> At least on the high-end bodies...  on the affordable bodies mirror box 
>> alignment is one of those things that's cut out to make the desired price 
>> point.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> 


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Endgadget on the MM)