Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2012 10:04 a.m. To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Endgadget on the MM Where did you hear that? There can be some issue with exposure readings but nothing wrong with focus... Was what I said (NZ time of course ;-)) john ________________________________________ On May 30, 2012, at 7:05 PM, John McMaster wrote: > That was in my first reply, there are other ways of meter reading but > (with correct exposure) there would be no difference in Nikon or Canon > bodies... I don't follow this John , I'm sorry, there is a simply a very real difference in the results of our picture taking.... I have done this myself, Steve > > john > ________________________________________ > > > On May 30, 2012, at 7:00 PM, John McMaster wrote: > >> I guess the difference is adaptors (wobbly) or Leitax, with the latter >> (and only way to fit to Nikon) I would expect no difference in >> Canon/Nikon. > > > but there is a difference... in the linearity of exposure compensation. > > Steve > >> >> john >> ________________________________________ >> >>> >>> Where did you hear that? There can be some issue with exposure readings >>> but nothing wrong with focus... >>> >> >> At least on the high-end bodies... on the affordable bodies mirror box >> alignment is one of those things that's cut out to make the desired price >> point. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information ------------------------------------------------------------ Mail was checked for spam by the Freeware Edition of CleanMail. The Freeware Edition is free for personal and non-commercial use. You can remove this notice by purchasing a full license!