Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The Portra films of today are very different, and greatly improved from the films of the 90s. They are sharper, have greater exposure latitude, and much finer grain. There are also fewer versions?160, 400, and 800. No VC and NC. They all render color differently, more or less saturated, although with Photoshop those differences are easily manipulated. I think Richard, the best thing to do is try a bit of each one and compare them. See which you like best. How large will you be printing? The difference between 400 and 160, at least in terms of grain, are fairly nominal until you get large, over about 20x24 from 120 in my experience. I have limited experience with E6?I shot a bunch of Astia, but that was a while ago. I currently use Portra 400 in 120, and Portra 160 in 4x5. Have fun, we are very lucky, these are the best color films ever made. Richard Wasserman www.richardwasserman.net On Apr 14, 2012, at 3:29 AM, John McMaster wrote: > Has the emulsion got thinner over the years? It always used to be less > sharp > as the film was physically thicker that E6 or B&W.... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > 400 Overkill by a mile in medium format as it almost is in 35mm. > Try the Portra 800 stuff its grainless till you blow it up as big as your > house. > > For every penny they spent of the past several decades on B&W or > transparency development they spent a hundred bucks on color neg - C41. > Its really amazing stuff. > Think of 400 as your high rez spread. Or think of 400 as your 100. > Its really moved up a whole full notch. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information