Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Philippe, Thanks for looking - these are not RAW shots they are 'Fine" quality JPGs. Lightroom (3.5) does not support this camera's RAW format as yet, so I have not started shooting RAW (neither has Howard as far as I know). The last thing I need is yet another RAW conversion program on my desktop! (-: For any style or genre of photography, which does not require lenses the size of bazookas, this would be a good choice. In case you are desirous of using Leica M lenses, you would also have to check whether the viewfinder is good enough for critical manual focusing - by and large, I am an autofocus user, so this is not an essential requirement as far as I am concerned. Cheers Jayanand On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote: > Very nice indeed - I'd be curious to know how the raws behave when you > fiddle with them, any better/worse than the D700? > I was in the shop last Saturday but they didn't have any I could try. They > offer the full kit on order exclusively here so far which to me is a bit > expensive for a test ... So, just curious. > Well in truth very tempted to dump the D700 heavy weaponry after seeing > Howard's results and yours. > > > Amiti?s > Philippe > > > Tous vos emails en 1 clic avec l'application SFR Mail sur iPhone et > Android. > > > ======================================== > > Message du : 10/04/2012 09:09 > De : "Jayanand Govindaraj " <jayanand at gmail.com> > A : "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Copie ? : > Sujet : Re: [Leica] Panorama > > > Thanks everyone for looking and commenting. I,too, think the first one of > Semli was far better, and posted this as one more example of a beautiful > spot within the park - it is one end of a large waterhole called > "Adidaant". > > Nathan, No I have not taken many wide open, because there was no cause to > do so in Ranthambhore, and also because I was mainly using the 18mm. I plan > to experiment with the 60mm in the next few days, and will post some > examples next week of that lens wide open. I generally use wide open > settings only when I take portraits, or in low light - otherwise I > generally stop down in most of my photography. As a matter of fact when > shooting wildlife, I am continuously struggling with insufficient depth of > field with long lenses most of the time. > > Akhil, The shots were taken hand held and later stitched together in > Photoshop and then cropped. I do not think that Fuji has released the Leica > M adapter as yet - in any case I do not have one, and do not really foresee > using M lenses because the Fuji lenses, I feel, are more than good. Whether > I get an M adapter or not will depend on the price (-: As I mentioned in > an earlier message, this is very close to my idea of an ideal street > shooting kit - an autofocus rangefinder type body with 3 excellent lenses. > The only other lens I would probably buy is something wider than 28mm - say > a 21mm equivalent or so. > > Adam, You got it, because Fuji, in this camera at least, have a mode called > "Film Simulation" and my setting was Velvia - corresponds to the Camera > Profile setting of Vivid in Nikon. > > Cheers > Jayanand > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Adam Bridge wrote: > > > The colors in both of your panoramas are very vivid - I'm thinking Velvia > > when I see them. Is this the nature of the landscape or is it the camera? > > The greens are especially saturated. > > > > I don't mean this as a criticism, just asking to help me in evaluating > the > > images. > > > > Thank you for sharing the location. Fascinating. > > > > Sigh. I need to travel more. > > > > Adam > > > > On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:47 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: > > > > > Another panorama of another waterhole from Ranthambhore, again it is a > > six > > > panel panorama taken with the Fuji X-Pro 1 and the 18mm lens, stitched > > > together in Photoshop CS5.5. The camera settings were 1/400s at f8 at > > > ISO > > 200. > > > Again, processing was limited to contrast adjustments and a low level > of > > > sharpening: > > > > > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/jayanand/Panoramas/WaterholeP.jpg.html > > > > > > Please see LARGE. > > > > > > Comments and criticism, as ever, welcome. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Jayanand > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >