Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 09:29:44 +0930
References: <CAAsXt4MggD0Led2FwTjZQPvNnWUDzcC0wnC0yUE7skxjQAYDmA@mail.gmail.com> <002301cd15db$2bd89dd0$8389d970$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CABmfTOXG5g1ZO9AVaj8eEbJF5_LNKaPry9nn4cwsP1zDmXxdtA@mail.gmail.com>

Oh er, I've just realised that should actually be _in front_ of the
focus point by about 2.5 mm.

Marty

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wide open the point of correct focus should be slightly behind the
> focus point (about 2.5mm) but nowhere near as far as yours is. ?Did
> you send your camera in at the same time?
>
> Marty
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:28 AM, John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> 
> wrote:
>> I have just tested my Noctilux and 75mm Summilux at closest focussing, 
>> both
>> tested fine at distance. The Noctilux is spot on but the 75mm is back
>> focussing ~50mm and this is after a tweak at Solms....
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> My noctilux and M9 are back to NJ for the third time. If you remember, the
>> dealer sent them back 3 weeks ago because I complained it was back 
>> focusing
>> and the dealer finally agreed. Dealer got it back and no change. So back
>> again but "the noctilux person is on vacation until the 16th..."
>> Stinks...
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)