Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]After six weeks with an M9, I think the answer is "No I don't think so". I did think about keeping an M8 body for IR, but I don't do enough IR to justify it. I find the M9 is just better. Having the lenses used to their full potential on a digital body is still a revelation. Mark Pope, Swindon, Wilts UK Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog Picture a week (2012) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2012 Picture a week (2010) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010 Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009 (2008) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008 On 08/04/2012 16:07, Vick Ko wrote: > Would you trade your M9 to go back to an M8? > > Factors: > - M9 is still $5K to $6, and will start going down its devaluation curve > - M8 is likely at the bottom of its devaluation curve, with mint units > at $2.5K > - M8 is still a darned fine camera, and I still have a whack of UV/IR > filters > > Has anyone gone from M9 back to an M8? What were your reasons? > > Vick > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information