Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon
From: dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella)
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:50:01 -0500
References: <CAF8hL-FHOzYfurv9pp1a3+u1f3_39HGYsohp-=vvN=HOdG+Z9w@mail.gmail.com> <072001cd13b6$36967ca0$a3c375e0$@earthlink.net>
 
Until you use a 5.6/50mm SW Fujinon from the 1970s that does the same on 6x9 
rangefinders and actually has coupled focus... But it's a lot easier to find 
the SWC for the Hasselblad.

Dante

On Apr 6, 2012, at 0:29, "Frank Filippone" <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Once you use a SWC, there is no other WA lens.  None.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
> 
> But distortion wise, there is no comparison to the true Biogon SWC. The
> difference is startling.
> 
> Next time I'm going to bring a tripod...
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)
 In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] When a Biogon is no match for THE Biogon)