Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] retro focus…
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 01:47:58 -0700
References: <0AA0D6C6-986B-48D5-9DB8-DD9E4A7F142E@gmail.com> <CAF8hL-Fy3mz82+wFFKL9LiCTCRXcAQ587OQ7YbPoHB+3zCvP-w@mail.gmail.com> <D41C2698-8F60-4CF2-93A4-17BCB2E25EBB@gmail.com> <CAE3QcF5qDpaJ0+=quaDu4bt1FdYrSzuzUffj3mLJ2JO4LHvc_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 30, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Steve it is very likely worthwhile to have your lens adjusted to the newest
> standards for M8/9. Obviously this lens is very much worth some TLC. You
> could get a CLA at the same time ;-)
> Focus shift is certainly a characteristic that you need to take into
> account in use but that doesn't invalidate correct adjustment.
> If you do have your M9 adjusted at the same time they can compare where
> each component lies within its tolerances in case it is possible to tweak
> either for absolute best compatibility. Within tolerance is within
> tolerance of course and every properly adjusted body should work properly
> with every properly adjusted lens. Nevertheless I know that the Solms
> people can and do make extra efforts to refine adjustments further. In the
> immortal words of the Solms technician who checked my 50 and 75 with my M8
> upgrade "Your lenses are good! We can make them better"
> 
> I have no personal experience with NJ but you can of course deal directly
> with Solms if you choose.


thanks Geoff,  appreciated



Steve


> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
> 
> 
> On 31 March 2012 05:52, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 30, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>> 
>>> I think the proper terms is back focus.
>>> 
>>> If the focus point changes as you change the aperture, then it's focus
>>> shift and you are stuck. You can then decide to calibrate to an aperture
>>> that makes the most sense to you, usually at wide open and hope the DoF
>>> will cover for any errors in narrower aperture.
>>> 
>>> Certainly I would do that. It's hard enough to focus at F1. Any type of
>>> back or front focus and you are upping the odd of mis-focused shots.
>>> 
>>> I believe this is one of the reasons why the Nocti /0.95 was created.
>>> 
>>> You should test out whether it's focus shift. Just put the camera on a
>>> tripod and photograph a yard stick at an angle. Take multiple photos
>>> without changing the focus but only the aperture.
>> 
>> 
>> thanks Richard,
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
>>> gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> my Noctilux at f1 shows a small degree of retro/posterior focus on my M9
>>>> body.
>>>> 
>>>> Can I fix this? How? Or should it the M9 body plus/minus the lens be
>> sent
>>>> to Leica for ideal calibration?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> to New Jersey or Solms?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> many thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Steve
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] retro focus…)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] retro focus…)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] retro focus…)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] retro focus…)