Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: OK, ISO 400 120 film...
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:42:40 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-GGCMjS03CQ17TLUf0JA1WBdD9U0xxBC9x6N63LB5yAdw@mail.gmail.com> <038e01cd0e79$00540370$00fc0a50$@earthlink.net>

Frank, I always scan and post process.

I use 2 bath Pyrocat-HD. Absolutely no scanning issue as you can see. I
have been using that since last Oct or so. So all my Chinatown film images
and all the SWC images you may have seen are using that workflow. It really
does give excellent result.


On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at 
earthlink.net>wrote:

> HP5+ is a fine film.  Works well in Pyro developers.
>
> Which Pyro version do you use?  Do you scan after wards or print from the
> negs optically?
>
> Certain PYRO had issues with scanners....
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
>
>
> So what's a good ISO-400'ish 120 film with good latitude? For ISO 100,
> Delta
> 100 seems to be superb. My 2 test rolls of TX-400 is pretty OK and I can
> certainly live with it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: OK, ISO 400 120 film...)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] OT: OK, ISO 400 120 film...)