Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I felt the Neopan edged out Delta by a small Margin. I could use either. None of these films had latitude issues with Xtol 1:3 with a two bath you'll get even more leeway that you wont even need. The results I got from these films looked like I was using 100 speed films. Both in terms of grain and sharpness. Latitude was just not an issue. -- Mark Rabiner http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/springdays/ > From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:55:43 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: [Leica] OT: OK, ISO 400 120 film... > > When I shot the Mamiya 7II for a year, I don't think I ever come to term > with the ISO 400 film. I tried TMY-2, TX-320 and TX-400 and they all are OK > but none really click - of course that was before I was using 2-bath > Pyrocat-HD, so may be things are different now. > > So what's a good ISO-400'ish 120 film with good latitude? For ISO 100, > Delta 100 seems to be superb. My 2 test rolls of TX-400 is pretty OK and I > can certainly live with it. > > Thanks, > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information