Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Nokton 35mm F1.4 WAS 40MM
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:37:28 -0700
References: <001401cd0c6b$02de00b0$089a0210$@earthlink.net> <AA13FFFB-4408-4C2A-8CE1-600E3524E82E@frozenlight.eu> <0DE25583-C46C-4E6D-97D3-EB2B25258899@embarqmail.com>
 
Too big and heavy and $$$$... Focus on light and fast, and you get the 1.4
as the choice... And it is pretty low cost too.....

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
Ric
Carter
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 10:19 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Nokton 35mm F1.4 WAS 40MM

what he said

ric


On Mar 28, 2012, at 12:55 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Get the f1.2 35mm instead.
> 
> Nathan Wajsman


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Nokton 35mm F1.4 WAS 40MM)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nokton 35mm F1.4 WAS 40MM)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Nokton 35mm F1.4 WAS 40MM)