Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 21:44:35 +0100
References: <CAEFNq_ahAsvor4PZtNH3TfoStRvOaeqboML02XPK=RzZNj62eQ@mail.gmail.com> <411E3A52-6372-40EF-A9D7-D4B15C315A78@mac.com>

Very happy here too. I have the Pro package, and have been with Smugmug for 
several years. I pay an annual fee of $100 as far as I remember, it has been 
the same since I joined. No limits on either size or traffic.  The Pro 
package allows me to use my own domain, if you are happy with a standard 
Smugmug name, it is a lot cheaper.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:29 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> 
> On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Benjamin Marks wrote:
> 
>> Any happy or unhappy SmugMug users here?  I am looking for a public place
>> to display photos.  Size limits? Fees? IP license gotchas?  I don't mind a
>> modest fee if the service is good.
> 
> very happy
> most especially
> with Lightroom interface
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser 
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from photobynelsch at gmail.com (Bill Nelsch) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)
In reply to: Message from benmarks2005 at gmail.com (Benjamin Marks) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] LUG users happy w/SmugMug?)