Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]How very cynical of you Nathan. Actually I've had personal support and assistance on LR from the most senior levels amongst Adobe's engineers. They seem nice guys to me and genuinely want to do the best for their customers. That is in everyone's interest of course. I'm out! Cheers, Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 11 March 2012 08:45, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > Or they ignored feedback from the beta test. After all, beta testing > brings in zero cash, selling half-finished software does. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > > YNWA > > > > On Mar 10, 2012, at 11:07 PM, John McMaster wrote: > > > It looks like these bugs were not in the beta....... > > > > john > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > As normally happens, LR4 is installed along side the earlier version, it > > doesn't replace it. I don't use custom tone curves (butno doubt others > > do) . LR3 and its catalog is still available to me on my computers. > > > > Adobe should release a beta for free first and anyone that wants could > run > > it for free then bugs could be found and reported. After thousands of > people > > have voluntarily participated there for weeks. ....Oh wait! > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >