Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]and, i believe it let's keep the old version and convert a copy of the photo--have your cake and eat it too. ric On Mar 10, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Richard Man wrote: > Hee hee. No, you can keep your old process, even for new images. > > Also, frankly for new files, I don't why one would. You'd need Process 2012 > to use the new tools, and the new tools are awesome! > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at > frozenlight.eu>wrote: > >> Thanks for this link, Richard. It persuaded me to wait at least a couple >> of months before upgrading to LR4. Please continue the beta testing for me >> ;-) >> >> Cheers, >> Nathan >> >> Nathan Wajsman >> Alicante, Spain >> http://www.frozenlight.eu >> http://www.greatpix.eu >> http://www.nathanfoto.com >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ >> >> >> YNWA >> >> >> >> On Mar 10, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Richard Man wrote: >> >>> So, I'm not the only person seeing some changes, hence Adobe offering the >>> option of upgrading all files to new process or per file basis. I am >>> definitely not going to convert all my old files, but of course on new >>> images, I will use 2012 Process. >>> >>> http://daily.lenswork.com/2012/03/lightroom-4-process-update.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information