Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The previous version only had focus shift if you actually looked at the pictures afterward. -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:35:13 +1300 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Probably a silly question.... > > Why? I have owned and been using the lens for over a year... > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > Yes I was looking through some of them were you? > > -- >> >> Google "35mm Summilux FLE" gets me 466,000 hits with Mr Rockwell at the >> top.... >> >> john >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Welli'd replied that the term FLE Is not used on the box but I'm also > going >> to say its not used very often at all to describe the lens by people on >> chatgroups NOT on the box. Easy enough to check just search engines for > 35mm >> Summilux FLE and see how many hits you get. >> >>> >>> Shorthand for people to know the difference in model, would you rather I >> said >>> that a 11663 was available? >>> >>> john >>> ________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> FLE is Zeiss. >>> You'll not find it on a Leica box nor on a lens. >>> Just think of it as "Fleiss". >>> >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information