Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] S2 vs. 645D
From: vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:57:57 -0500
References: <CAF8hL-FMqwPA5awOq0PmRjWCrSUXf7So1_naU6q2DV5BY31RaQ@mail.gmail.com> <922868256.4187861330895419072.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <CAF8hL-FNBLyfDsOVVujKmCgyj32zxApU=spJ2JpncxQ-uJMTCA@mail.gmail.com> <4B0DF6ED-8856-4DC0-BB32-3A4BC238D5EB@mac.com> <CAF8hL-Fg_p5YCONYCSz4zLowE_DNkKCmWDEBNBP1_LnvjrrcWA@mail.gmail.com>
No temptation here.
Seems to me that the S2 is waaayyyy out of affordability.
I don't recall any of the previous Leica products being so
unaffordable. Even with the most outrageous product (say, 0.95
Noctilux), I felt that it was affordable with say two to three years of
focused saving.
Not so the $28K for S2 and lens.
Vick
On 3/4/2012 4:50 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> The client list is pretty short:
> 1 - me
>
> :-)
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:38 PM, George Lottermoser<imagist3 at mac.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Can't help wondering about the "client list" here.
>>
>>
In reply to:
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)