Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] S2 vs. 645D
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:38:55 -0600
References: <CAF8hL-FMqwPA5awOq0PmRjWCrSUXf7So1_naU6q2DV5BY31RaQ@mail.gmail.com> <922868256.4187861330895419072.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <CAF8hL-FNBLyfDsOVVujKmCgyj32zxApU=spJ2JpncxQ-uJMTCA@mail.gmail.com>
 
On Mar 4, 2012, at 3:28 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> That way of thinking leads to madness!
> 
> $13K for H4D-31, but hey
> $13K for a P40+, and "only" $5K more to get an Alpa and a good lens!
> But hey,
> $18K, may as well pay another $4K for the S2 body and what's another $4K
> for a lens?
> 
> But wait... $26K? You can get a P65+ and another $5K for an Alpa with a
> good lens!
> $31K? Chump change. Now you can get a S2P setup!
> 
> Or wait, $31K + $8K gets you the ULTIMATE IQ180. Who doesn't want THAT?
> Another $15K gets you the ultimate ultimate Alpa with 3 lens setup.
> 
> So now we are looking at $52K.
> 
> All because $13K is just $2K more than $11K.
> 
> AND NOT a single photo has been taken.

Can't help wondering about the "client list" here.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)
 In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 vs. 645D)