Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]After spending 8 grand on a lens I'm not going to leave it at home because I wish it was more compact. I'm sure we're looking at the apogee of optical lens design to ever exist in the world. You're the top! You're Mahatma Gandhi. You're the top! You're Napoleon brandy. You're the purple light of a summer night in Spain. You're the National Gallery; you're Garbo's salary, You're cellophane! -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > From: Gary Pinkerton <gpinkcp at msn.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:44:58 -0600 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] S2 > > The body size is ok, it's just that those lenses are waaay too big ! > (that lessens the pain of my not being able to afford'em :) > >> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:14:26 -0800 >> From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net >> To: lug at leica-users.org >> Subject: Re: [Leica] S2 >> >> Ric Carter wrote: >> >>> >>> how does the size compare with current nikon and canon dslr? >>> >> >> body only: >> >> Canon 1DsIII 1385 grams 150 x 160 x 80 mm >> >> Leica S2 1410 grams 160 x 120 x 81 mm >> >> Doug Herr >> Birdman of Sacramento >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information