Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for commenting, Mark. The light was so poor at the spot they were growing, at the edge of a dense growth of Nandina bushes, that I felt the fill might be needed. Obviously, it was a poor choice. As light as that camera and lens combination is, I can hold fairly well at 1/60th, particularly when I am down on my knees and elbows. ;~) Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 10:14 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash > White flowers in the dappled sunlight and excellent example of a close-up > nature shot with needs no flash Phil. > Though shooting hand held close-ups at a 60th of a second is far from not > ideal. > > -- > Mark R. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > > >> From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:58:11 -0500 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Crocus Without Flash >> >> +4 >> >> ric >> >> >> On Feb 25, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Sonny Carter wrote: >> >>> I'm agreeing. No flash >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >