Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As I pointed out early in this thread, Panasonic has a Pro camera for 4/3. I have nothing against the format. On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>wrote: > Hey now Sonny, if you compare 4/3 and the M9, then of course :-) > > It's after all, a difference of $7000-$600! > > p.s. the latest m4/3 sensors/lens apparently hold up well against even the > 7D and the like, according to DXOMark - if there is ever a "everything is > science" way of doing camera testing, they are it - so it must be correct > :-) > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, just like I fell for 4/3. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Sonny > > http://sonc.com/look/ > > Natchitoches, Louisiana > > > > USA > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Regards, Sonny http://sonc.com/look/ Natchitoches, Louisiana USA