Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Designed and sourced. Not sure who grind the glass elements. On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hand made .... as in ground or does this just mean assembled? > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Richard Man > <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote: > > Well, they are hand made lens. I think of it as a way to support dying > > breed of craftsman. > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at > > archiphoto.com > >wrote: > > > >> Interesting. Doesn't quite ring my bell for the price, but it certainly > is > >> small. > >> > >> On the documentation the spelling has been adjusted. Now it's the "Super > >> Tripret". I'm sure it still works. > >> > >> > >> On 2012-02-23, at 7:01 PM, Richard Man wrote: > >> > >> > As I mentioned before, I love the Pera 35/3.5 lens. Collapsed, it's > >> hardly > >> > larger than a body cap so there really is no reason not to take the M > >> > everywhere. This is the reason why I'm not interested m 4/3, X10 etc. > >> Sure, > >> > it doesn't zoom or has liveview or do video, but comparing to an M9, > >> > everything else just seems a bit lacking (except for the XPan of > course > >> > :-), or an Alpa, or an S2, or...) <-- my opinions only and I am > talking > >> > about for myself only. Everyone is entitled to their preferences. > >> > > >> > Anyway, the Pera 35 is no longer the smallest M lens. That honor is > now > >> on > >> > another lens that Miyazaki san makes by hand: the Perar 28/4 Super > >> Tpirlet > >> > (the first batch all has the misspelling). It doesn't collapse and > it's > >> > smaller than the Perar 35 collapsed! > >> > > >> > Mine came in today and I just took a few quick test shots. The first > shot > >> > here is mainly to see what happens shooting into the Sun and it looks > >> > pretty good. All photos have been processed a bit using LR. Nothing > >> heroic. > >> > I also cropped the last two images a bit. > >> > > >> > All in all, looks like another winner. Now it's even more so of > having no > >> > excuse not to take the M9 everywhere! > >> > > >> > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20120223-L1009641.jpg > >> > > >> > > >> > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20120223-L1009646.jpg > >> > > >> > > >> > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20120223-L1009648.jpg > >> > > >> > -- > >> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Leica Users Group. > >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > >> > >> > >> Henning Wulff > >> henningw at archiphoto.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>