Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:02:29 -0600
References: <CAF8hL-G5zKr5uXiBEL0zzn4xQOBjHZk8Rus8p9qKVRUD9=j=Rw@mail.gmail.com><CABXy406ULP=+RimaobscO1ab2MXV38f7de_BNs4xCXZLUUpMQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-EmZhyO5W5e6YjU-hLrusKPBfjyfv63vEe5mH9mCWKeVw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Richard,

In my case, it was mostly guesswork.  It was the better image, and the tones 
and detail, along with less compression of her facial features, seemed to 
tell me it was the shorter lens.

Nice image of a beautiful lady, regardless of the lens!

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been


> Hi Jim and Ken, indeed I like the 2nd one better myself and it's the 75
> Summilux one, so great guess!
>
> OK, now can you tell me what signature gave it away? There are some
> processing, but not much and nothing that should detract from the lens
> itself too much.
>
>
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been)
Message from ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been)