Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Predator/prey, re-processed
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:33:51 +0100
References: <380-220122214154652644@M2W124.mail2web.com> <A08D701E-D36E-4434-9B59-57213B79DC2A@mac.com>

Agreed

Else your "signature tones" would be lost

Ain't it in the book BTW?  :-)

Amiti?s
Philippe

Le 14 f?vr. 12 ? 17:57, George Lottermoser a ?crit :

>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 9:46 AM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net wrote:
>
>> original:
>>
>> http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/ardeidae/L1640293.jpg
>>
>> re-processed:
>>
>> http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/ardeidae/caegre04.jpg
>
> Outstanding photograph!
>
> On my monitor the re-processed version looks too warm/red.
> Though it also has more brightness and sparkle (in the eye).
> It looks to me that the final version may fall between the two  
> presented here.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] IMG: Predator/prey, re-processed)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Predator/prey, re-processed)