Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] thoughts ?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:00:22 -0800
References: <408CF038-05D4-4FC0-B9CE-5370D40EF08C@gmail.com> <45337D29-45F4-47F7-ABC5-F1D30A5F27BD@mac.com>

On Feb 13, 2012, at 1:49 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> 
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
> 
>> first this
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW2012/struggling.jpg.html
>> 
>> now this
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW2012/color.jpg.html
>> 
>> I do ask please your input as to which of the two you find most 
>> effective, which you prefer (that may be different) and why that is ?
> 
> Every photographer needs to (at least occasionally) ask,
> "What am I trying to say with this photograph?"
> 
> most effective?
> to communicate what point (or points)?
> 
> For me:
> 
> Color photographs (when well done with decent equipment) appear "hyper 
> real" to my eye.
> Reality amplified and further enhanced by freezing a moment for detailed 
> study of COLOR, line, form and content.
> More real than reality.
> 
> Black and white photographs (when well done with decent equipment) 
> "suggest reality" to my eye.
> Reality subdued yet also enhanced by freezing a moment for detailed study 
> of texture, line, form and content.
> More metaphoric than reality.
> 
> Between these two (for the purpose of this discussion) extremes
> we could easily examine the effect of muting, in steps, the colors to 
> soften a "harsh" reality.
> 
> Yet we're still left with the question,
> "What does the photographer wish to communicate?"
> A harshly real environmental, candid portrait?
> A metaphorically real environmental, candid portrait?
> Or something in between?
> 
> A final decision, for me would depend on the "use" context.
> We're looking at these two photographic possibilities out of context on 
> our computer screens.
> We're looking at them surrounded by emails, our other work, within our 
> homes or offices.
> Some of us, like Sonny, see them within a context "very close to home" - 
> living with a similar actual reality.
> Others of us see them in the context of memories of friends or love ones 
> who've moved on.
> "Choosing" one or the other (or an unseen in between version) would, for 
> me, require knowledge of the book or article which may surround them.
> Each treatment provokes a different reaction.
> Each viewer will have a different reaction to each treatment.
> 
> One thing's for sure.
> With each passing year we're all headed toward "this state of being" one 
> way or another.
> I see no lack of dignity in either version.
> We all eat; and need cleaning up.


very well thought through, thanks George,

Steve


> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser 
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jackyaus at gmail.com (Jacky aus) ([Leica] thoughts ?)
In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] thoughts ?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] thoughts ?)