Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Tim I myself am very glad to know exactly this! -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > From: Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:08:04 -0500 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Mark, your new NEC screen > > On Feb 01, 2012 at 06:59 PM -0500, Mark Rabiner wrote: >> Its an LCD with a LED backlight. So its perhaps some kind of hybrid? >> I never did get it straight which was better LCD or LED anyway. Maybe both >> is better. > > LED screens are LCDs. Plain and simple. Non-LED LCDs used CCFLs (cold > cathode fluorescent lamp) lights for the backlight for the most part. > LED screens use LEDs to backlight the LCD. > > As far as LED or CCFL backlight being better, it depends on the quality > of the lighting. LED has the potential to be better in the long run > with better color gamut, as well as being able to be switched on locally > on certain parts of the display (boosts contrast range), as opposed to > just providing a uniform backlight. They also can lead to lower power > usage and thinner displays. However, with the current tech, a lot of > the mid range monitors that demand color accuracy still use CCFL > backlighting, like NEC's PA series. But it mostly depends on the > quality of the LED or CCFL used. > > I'm sure this is more than you wanted to know :) I'm also sure you'll > enjoy your monitor - I love my NEC. > > Tim > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information