Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] To the pano stitchers...
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:32:46 -0800
 
Other than the difference in number of frames to cover a particular area,
are there image quality differences in using a longer lens rather than a
shorter lens? For example, 25, 35, 50 or 75 on a full frame body, which one
may be better image quality wise?

Thanks for any advice.

-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] To the pano stitchers...)
Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] To the pano stitchers...)
Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] To the pano stitchers...)