Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Controversial?
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:22:24 -0500
References: <0D49E68B-9AA6-46B9-BF31-BC4B34A99E86@sfr.fr>
 
lists such as this are always wrong and right at the same time

can cause entertaining discussion

today, i own 44, 38, 20, 17, 15, 8, 4, & 1

a couple more, i wish i owned

ric


On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:48 PM, philippe.amard wrote:

> Might be ...
> http://www.photographymonthly.com/Magazine/2010/50-Greatest-Cameras-of-All-Time
> 
> Bien cordialement de Metz
> Philippe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)
 In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT: Controversial?)