Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry Jim, but if these results are really what the film delivers, and are not the result of overenthusiastic sharpening in the digital stage, then you should bit the bullet and throw away the remaining rolls. Your pictures deserve better. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On Jan 26, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Jim Nichols wrote: > In searching for film available locally, I found a 4-roll pack of Kodak > Ultramax 400, so I gave it a try. To me, except in bright light, the > noise level is objectionable, but I plan to use it up anyway. > > My film is processed at Walgreen's, as seen here through the windshield: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Walgreen+12a.jpg.html > > My airport friends began to "ham it up" when they saw my camera pointed > their way: > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Airport+Friends.jpg.html > > Bessa R2a with Canon 50/1.4, Kodak Ultramax 400, with a little help from > Neat Image > > Comments and critiques welcomed. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >