Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would add a comment that you consider the difference between a good print on glossy stock and one on photo rag. Tone, contrast, saturation, viewability and 'impact' can all vary. A good hood and neutral surrounds make a very large difference too. Depends how hard core you are I guess (common monitor usage vs. best transmissive approximation of a print). Cheers Geoff *Die besten W?nsche* http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 13 January 2012 21:58, Philip Leeson <leesonpj at gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW, for those bothered by the shiny screens on iMacs, it takes about 30 > seconds > to remove it and be left with the matte LED monitor panel. > No black trim makes it looks rather industrial as well?. > > > PJL > On Jan 12, 2012, at 11:32 PM, John McMaster wrote: > > > I hate shiny screens, paid extra for my 17" MBP to have a matt one - no > idea > > why Apple have gone glossy only :-( > > > > Depends on how you work, I like large screens and have done for well > over a > > decade. Let's you see more of the picture without palettes over the top, > > multiple images/documents side by side, email and web at the same time, > etc. > > I suspect that once you use one you will know why... > > > > john > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > And Apple seems to have gone the way of the LED. > > Real shiny ones > > > > Is there a reason to want to have a huge monitor? > > They all seem huge to me. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >