Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The DIN standard is still part of the ISO standard for film, it's just that it has become normal to cite the arithmetic number from the ASA standard alone. For instance it's ISO 100/21. I don't have a copy of ISO 12232:2006 to be sure if this is the case for digital ISO determination, but I do note that the ISO standard for digital cameras is even more confusing than the film standard because there are five different "standard" techniques for determining the exposure index rating at each sensitivity setting provided by a particular camera model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_speed#Digital_camera_ISO_speed_and_exposure_index Marty On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Colin Baker <colin at colinbaker.org> wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:16:13 -0600, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> > wrote: > >> But we have to be up on our logarithmics. I'm not. >> I thought iso 64,000 was going to be a world away from 16,ooo. >> Its only two stops! Which is tri x instead of plus x. big deal! >> Sounded to me at first like the difference between Pan F and pushed Tmax >> 3200! >> But it just ain't true. >> > > I've always wondered if we'll ever switch back to the DIN standard. ?These > crazy ISOs are a mouthful! > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information