Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]How is a lower MPixel count and smaller sensor better? Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:43:57 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1 Because a lot of the new M9 owners bought them because it's the "best camera" there is, and now there's "one better." Just sayin', the used M9 can now be have for around $5400. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > Why would people dump an M9 for it? I can see some people possibly buy it > instead of an M9 which is not quite the same thing ;-) AFAIK a lot of the > below is still conjecture.... > > john > ________________________________________ > > > Expect to hear about this A LOT in the next few days, on this and other > forum. > > 16 MP, APS-C, 3 FAST prime lens (27, 53, 90 equivalent). 2nd generation > hybrid EVF. > > No price, but if it's just a bit over the X-100, oh boy... expect some > people to dump their M9 :-) Here's your chance to get yours :-)!!! > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information