Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Looking at buying an M8
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:13:03 -0600
References: <22621240.1324253641646.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <01D4B129-B42B-4515-8EBC-73419678A9E6@mac.com> <E86CCEA2-97FD-4C43-8CB2-2DF4F65C5F0D@frozenlight.eu> <BLU0-SMTP1392DBACF66933A62126978CA70@phx.gbl> <AC444E49995C4B6794A05BED94D37FF4@syneticfeba505>

Yes, it works that way at first.  When I first started this hobby, I had 
an M3 and some lenses, then a Contax, and then a seminar with Cole 
Weston where he suggested I would be much better off with a 4x5.  So I 
got a Linhof Technica.  That, of course, led to an 8x10.  I was actually 
thinking about an 11x14 when I met David Kennedy, who did buy one when 
he moved from NYC to New Mexico only to find that his scene was pretty 
much gone while he set up.

Ken

On 12/19/2011 9:43 AM, tedgrant at shaw.ca wrote:
> Nathan Wajsman OFFERED::
>> to try to rationalize photo equipment purchases from a financial 
>> point of view is futile<<<<
>
> Absolutely!!!!!!! :-)
>
> My first 2 1/4 camera was a Rolleicord. Had it for 23 days, of course 
> it worked fine. HOWEVER???? :-) As I read more and more photo 
> magazines in the following days and stories about many of the "great 
> shooters" of the early '50's they were using Rolleiflex! I returned 
> the Rolleicord, they allowed me 50% trade in after only 23 days and I 
> gave them the box and all the paper work. It wouldn't surprise me they 
> sold it again as "New!"
>
> By the way the Rolleiflex cost $310.00 Cdn.
>
> We eventually learn it isn't the equipment, (it helps depending on 
> your assignment requirements) but the person holding it that observes 
> the moment and "CLICK!"
>
> "If I only had a Rollieflex, my pictures would be so much better!" I 
> fretted over this for 23 days , then finally walked into my favourite 
> camera store, I think at the time I might have been their favourite 
> customer! :-) As I was always just going to "LOOK?" :-) But always 
> came out with something new because I just had to have the best! I was 
> always in debt because quite often I never asked the price ? It was "I 
> need !" And it was handed to me and it went on my account and I 
> eventually paid for it. :-)
>
> Sooner or later experience kick's in and you learn......... "I don't 
> really need that lens! Just take two steps closer!" And you'll be 
> fine. However for some of us slower learners? ;-) It really take's 
> time. :-)
>
> cheers,
> Dr. ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Look, I bought the M8)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Looking at buying an M8)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Looking at buying an M8)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Looking at buying an M8)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Looking at buying an M8)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Looking at buying an M8)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Looking at buying an M8)