Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually, I was thinking about the need for the initial repair you mentioned rather than the accident. Just one of those things, I guess. Thx for the reference to B&H - that's a pretty good price. I would like to have the 24-105 and a second 5D MK II body, as right now I am using a 40D as a backup in case the 5D failed. Although, right now I am mainly focused on a bag with one camera and one lens and a really good light tripod. Ken On 12/13/2011 8:50 PM, Robert Adler wrote: > Hi Ken, > Not sure why you wouldn't buy the 24-105 based on this accident. I (and > many users I know) consider it a stellar lens. > > You can get a 5DMkII AND a 24-105 kit now on B&H or Adorama for $2,900.... > > >> Oh Sierra, as they say. I was thinking of buying the 24-105 as a travel >> alternative to the 24-70, but now maybe not. Maybe you can ask Canon for >> a >> quote and whether it can guarantee original performance in your case. A >> new 5DII and that lens would be about $4k, so it might be worth submitting >> for a quote. Just a thought. Wish I had a loaner, but they are all film >> and 4x5 at that. >> >> Ken >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > >