Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica lllF RD
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:59:08 +0530
References: <20111210195230.FBXQ24132.priv-edmwes26.telusplanet.net@edmwcm04>

Except for the seperate rangefinder and viewfinder, and the film loading,
which IMHO are both major pains, it is no problem. If you want a body that
is much easier to use, but takes Leica LTM lenses, look for a Canon 7/7s
they are far and away the most usable. I have both a IIIf and a Canon 7
which I have used in the past, so this is based on pertsonal preference:

http://www.cameraquest.com/canon7sz.htm

Cheers
Jayanand



On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Barry Hinderks <Barry98 at telus.net> wrote:

> A question for the users of the above camera. I had a chance to handle one
> yesterday and was amazed by the feel, size and precision. Compared to my M6
> it is tiny. How is it as a real world shooter? I know about the loading
> qualities and the split rangefinder and viewfinder but are there any other
> quirks?
> The one I looked at is for sale and the fellow is asking $250USD. The
> curtains are good, shutter speeds look good from the images produced the
> other day, there are the usual tiny, tiny marks on the bottom plate and a
> few on the top plate, no dents or dings and the vulcanite is all there. Is
> the ask price reasonable and how serviceable are the LTMs?
> Many thanks
> BarryH
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>


Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Leica lllF RD)
In reply to: Message from Barry98 at telus.net (Barry Hinderks) ([Leica] Leica lllF RD)