Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/12/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Daguerreotype Details
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:23:05 -0600
References: <CAFfkXxu+ugXosTTko=Qy36XD1UMcdCQoQxRXa5ADrnh-nSphbQ@mail.gmail.com> <FC231985-EE4B-48AA-8B4B-3AD53B15FF56@btinternet.com> <CABmfTOWLB_DgkiNLjWVp6_dtmEUiYYbf5eNpr1j=OXw2Wov-=A@mail.gmail.com> <4E95B80E-0A39-4FC3-9BDD-8846513514AE@btinternet.com>
On Dec 1, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Frank Dernie wrote:
> So the extra resolution attributed in the original article to the process
> itself is wrong then?
perfectly "flat" plane of focus + ultra fine grain = high resolution.
Probably whether glass or etc.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
Replies:
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Daguerreotype Details)
In reply to:
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Daguerreotype Details)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Daguerreotype Details)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Daguerreotype Details)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Daguerreotype Details)