Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Strange law in Quebec
From: kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:11:03 -0800
References: <CAFCEE3A.FB32%manolito@videotron.ca> <C6FA9E547B684DE3908B3304094972C0@billHP> <458822BB-26CB-4DB5-9663-BEDD4DD46D31@me.com> <CAF8hL-GMGw+Uhnw4F7ozT=fT3NbsPrwWZ+OTMh9P3yN-id85AA@mail.gmail.com>
 
I believe that these days you have to convince the Canadian 
government that you'd be an asset.

Herb

>My wife has been saying "we should move to Canada" due to healthcare
>concerns for a few years. Don't you guys start now....
>
>
>
>--
>// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Herbert Kanner
kanner at acm.org
650-326-8204

Question authority and the authorities will question you.
In reply to: Message from manolito at videotron.ca (EPL) ([Leica] Strange law in Quebec)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] Strange law in Quebec)
Message from s_gregory1 at me.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Strange law in Quebec)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Strange law in Quebec)