Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Have fun in Carmel. I signed up for the workshop once but then realize that there's no way I can master the darkroom techniques in the time I can give it. So LR/Photoshop for me. Film scanning is easy enough :-) On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:48 PM, <afirkin at afirkin.com> wrote: > > Just got back 3 rolls of MF film from the lab in Barcelona, shot with my > > Fuji 6x9. Of the 24 pictures in total, 14 are blank frames. And no, I did > > not accidentally photograph the inside of my camera bag this many times, > > since I follow the standard Leica RF practice of not advancing the film > > before putting the camera in the bag. I guess the lens shutter is > > sticking, i.e. not opening about half the time. Given that I only paid > > $300 for this camera, the fact that it has turned into a paperweight is > > annoying but not devastating. But it does mean that I am on the lookout > > for a reliable 6x7 or 6x9 MF outfit. > > > > Or I should just stop this film foolishness and get on with life in the > > 21st century. > > Hi Nathan, I'm having trouble keeping my eyes open, having just arrived in > the USA today, but this comment 'perked' me up. I am here in Carmel about > to start a workshop in the darkroom with John Sexton. To do this, I > prepared by taking film in the X pan to Kenya and also to the Mono lake > workshop I attended a few weeks back. Then when I got home I dusted off > the darkroom (pleasingly the dust was the least of my troubles) and began > processing. > > Having given my Jobo away, I only had the CPE to keep the temperature > right, and that died half way through: I can't complain, I bought it in > the early 80's, but I did 'regret' giving the ATL 3 away -- I will never > buy another and it took me so long to get it BUT I have been convinced > that if I'm to work in the darkroom than constant agitation is not ideal > for film processing and that paper is better processed in trays -- less > 'trauma' for the fibre based paper in some ways, though I soon found my > 'sloppy' habits led to stains and creases on the edges. > > For the first time in 20 years, the darkroom smelt of chemicals and I > realized what others here have complained about: the Jobo sat under a > strong exhaust and I never 'smelt' anything. > > I 'labored' for 5 days and produced about 30 prints, 10 of which I had to > choose to take to the workshop. They were 'ok' but I was using Grade 4.5 > to 5 for almost all the prints: I think the films were all fogged. The > spectrometer tells me the base celluloid is one whole zone above the > density I used to have on the Ilford film a few years ago. Now it was not > 'pristine' new film, but it was not terribly old by my standards, and has > been fridged so I'm pretty sure it was the 'scanners'. (ISO 80 and 250 > BTW). > > Then I started the Kenyan films: I was very excited about these. African > panoramas. The first one I printed (after processing all 6 rolls and > contact printing) had strange densities that I had 'tried' to ignore on > the contact sheet, hoping it was the plastic I used to hold hte film flat > BUT no. The next shot (almost identical) was also 'scarred'. I immediately > blamed my processing: did I agitate enough? BUT the more I looked at them > the less I was convinced. This 35mm film is of course in small metal > containers, they were 'bunched' together in the handluggage and there is a > potential weak point where the felt stops light, but not X rays, so this > could explain why the patterns were somewhat irregular: I really don't > think my processing would have scarred across the film like this: the 120 > rolls did not have the same pattern, so once again I think the entire > project was ruined by radiation. Helen asked me if I could 'rescue' any > and I said "maybe, if I scanned them and 'patched' them up in PS" but in > the end why have film and digitize it when you can use digital capture in > the first place. > > So if this is true then you cannot carry film when you travel by air, and > this is my major interest in photography. If I cannot use film on my > travels I will soon lose any skills I have. > > I rang a friend last week before come to the USA and he just said: "you > should think about getting one of those new digital camera things". I will > enjoy the darkroom workshop, but there is a sword hanging over the > darkroom and the thread holding it is very thin!! > > Perhaps I need to GROW UP ;-) > > That became longer than I expected, but kept me awake!!! > > Alastair > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>