Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/11/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 08:40:53 +1000
References: <000801cca0dd$601fdfe0$205f9fa0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <82016AC7-7887-432C-B161-417FC785E445@gmail.com> <4EBDDBEE.8080105@cox.net> <19CFE570-10CF-43BA-86AA-E4C74B3C5D64@ameritech.net> <4EBE9D4D.4070002@cox.net>
Possibly, however I recall visiting the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam and
viewing Rembrandt's "The Niight Watch". During its history the previous
owners lopped a couple of feet off the edges so it would fit in its current
location!
Cheers
Geoff
*Lighting- eyes- action*
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
On 13 November 2011 02:22, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
> I didn't know that. I'll add "eight feed wide" to the edition of six rule
> - should be rich soon.
>
> Ken
>
> On 11/11/2011 8:52 PM, Richard Wasserman wrote:
>
>> Please keep in mind that this particular print is about 8 feet wide. It's
>> only about $500,000 and change a foot....
>>
>> Richard Wasserman
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Replies:
Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
In reply to:
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from disfromage at ameritech.net (Richard Wasserman) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] (OT) A photo which costs more than a Cindy Sherman!)