Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Caution
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 00:06:19 -0700
References: <CACkqTDQ-2YeU_qgtsXqO0A_uw8UEi4GuVnaL2OoU8uUmfSAg7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-E5FRnZSZZb3yo+xcnxF+Gy+tNJSaM7NBn3HPwkPc17_g@mail.gmail.com> <CACkqTDR=QjBEPbPW9guG0YhdFitVC77n4bBxCfX5cXC=wUB9Aw@mail.gmail.com> <A42DA558-0C80-4C42-BACE-81C4587D499C@frozenlight.eu> <CACkqTDTBgkNBKskMj-7dzhrebux0RUBMszQQERABvOE-ndVoXw@mail.gmail.com>

Oh, the image is fine, the writing is fine. Just that there's a little bit
of non-sequiteur between the two, IMHO.

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Quan Tran <quantran101 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Richard and Nathan,
>
> That is a very interesting point of view.
>
> I remember at the scene, I first saw the train, my first impression was
> that it's such a beautiful train and wanting to take picture of the train.
> A split second later, this young lady and her shadow walked toward my
> direction, so I quick snap afraid to miss the shot if I was too slow and
> she walk out of the frame.
>
> When I look at the picture on the monitor later on, I like her shadow so
> much, I thought and wanting to write about it. I guess I like the shadow
> more than the train now as when I first saw the train.
>
> I am curious that my first intent somehow shows up in the final picture?
>
> If I did not write about the shadow, would your reaction be different?
>
> You two get me curious now.
>
> Thank you very much for your input, I learn so much from this mailing list
> than from anywhere else.
>
> -Quan.
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu
> >wrote:
>
> > I had a bit of the same reaction, that there are two unrelated images
> here.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nathan
> >
> > Nathan Wajsman
> > Alicante, Spain
> > http://www.frozenlight.eu
> > http://www.greatpix.eu
> > http://www.nathanfoto.com
> > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> >
> >
> > YNWA
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Quan Tran wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > When I was writing, I didn't think about the train at all. I was so
> focus
> > > on the shadow, and the train escape me. I don't know why. You got me
> > there.
> > > Maybe the essay does not fit the picture very well.
> > >
> > > Thank you for pointing this out.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Richard Man <
> > richard at richardmanphoto.com>wrote:
> > >
> > >> The image by itself is nice. I see a nice shadow, and your essay talks
> > >> about shadow...
> > >>
> > >> But I also this great big train. How does that fit into your essay?
> :-)
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Quan Tran <quantran101 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> My attempt at street photography:
> > >>>
> > >>> http://fluxlux.blogspot.com/2011/11/caution.html
> > >>>
> > >>> All C&Cs are welcome.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Quan Tran.
> > >>> blog: http://fluxlux.blogspot.com/
> > >>>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from quantran101 at gmail.com (Quan Tran) ([Leica] Caution)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Caution)
Message from quantran101 at gmail.com (Quan Tran) ([Leica] Caution)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Caution)
Message from quantran101 at gmail.com (Quan Tran) ([Leica] Caution)