Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nikon 9000 repair WAS... More Occupy Photos
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 01:56:45 +0100
References: <CAF8hL-HTVfOMHkV+pOYf+g1xXuCKtqO0-3Feg=rPxPC3Rdoh3g@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP55C020897DA5C009E92A9B8CDA0@phx.gbl> <AACD1FB3-0422-4FB6-90B2-AEC82121BA87@usjet.net> <5D1C41EF-EC70-4B31-B07B-B3C94A66A550@gmail.com> <DA31FE22-D1EC-46EC-B1A8-734A499A7F95@usjet.net>

Bob,

Thank you for this explanation, this is more or less the same workflow  
I do with my Epson 3170, I think that the V700 will be a perfect tool  
for me also... I'm undecided.

cheers
Lluis


El 05/11/2011, a las 1:50, Robert Meier escribi?:

> Lluis,
>
> Two years ago I took a couple of negatives, one color, one B&W, into  
> West Photo in Minneapolis and scanned them on their Nikon Coolscan  
> 5000 and then on their Epson V700.   I took all the files home with  
> me on a flash drive and loaded them into Photoshop CS2 on my  
> computer.   I enlarged them all, gave them all the same degree of  
> sharpening, contrast, and saturation.   I then printed them al and  
> compared them.   I couldn't see any actual difference between  
> them.    I bought the V700.
>
> Robert
>
> On Nov 4, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
>
>> Bob,
>>
>> Did you never test the Plustek scanner, I shall replace my Epson  
>> flatbed scanner and following the advices of Geoff and Nathan, they  
>> say that a dedicated fil scanner will always give better than a  
>> flatbed. The Plustek is not expensive and for my mainly work in B&W  
>> could be useful, on the other hand. it has the inconvenient you can  
>> scann only one negative at time.
>>
>> I would appreciate your opinion and/ or other from other members on  
>> the List, thank you
>>
>> cheers
>> Lluis
>>
>>
>> El 04/11/2011, a las 20:12, Robert Meier escribi?:
>>
>>> I have used my V700 to scan B&W 35mm negs and then print them  
>>> 14x21 on my Epson 3880.   T are stunning -- the grain is crisp,  
>>> the tonality is superb.
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> On Nov 4, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Vick Ko wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wow, that is scary.
>>>>
>>>> I'm a bit hesitant on the 9000 because of its discontinuation.
>>>>
>>>> But multiple attempts to repair?   Ouch
>>>>
>>>> Vick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/4/2011 8:28 AM, Richard Man wrote:
>>>>> ..... I hope Nikon repair my scanner soon. They "fixed" the
>>>>> problem but the unit is basically DOA when they returned it :-(
>>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy!
>>>>> http://www.richardmanphoto.com/blog/?p=3079
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] More Occupy Photos)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Nikon 9000 repair WAS... More Occupy Photos)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Nikon 9000 repair WAS... More Occupy Photos)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Nikon 9000 repair WAS... More Occupy Photos)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Nikon 9000 repair WAS... More Occupy Photos)