Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...
From: ken at iisaka.com (Ken Iisaka)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:58:26 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-HfjZf966=8PDEMYYMLWH_NHVBe-OBvZ7j-M2P-dXqO9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-GLrp2yGUKXYOykMNt0E5DJn9+XP0MR2DUu5KQvrErfxw@mail.gmail.com>
 
Besides, most lenses don't resolve that much. So what you have more pixels
of blur? The real estate on the sensor is better used for extra sensitivity.

The direction is going towards that already.

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Richard Man <richard at 
richardmanphoto.com>wrote:

> Canon 1Dx weighs in at 18 Megapixel, the same as the M9. I think people are
> realizing that more MP -> need for faster processing and more storage. So
> 18
> may just be the sweet spot for full frame 35mm.
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Ken Iisaka
first name at last name dot org or com
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...)
Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...)
 In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] This is why there's no 30MP M10...)