Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Any number of UV filters > 0 is stupid by definition ;-) Nathan the Provo (after not sleeping since Monday night and drinking too much Taiwanese beer already) On 12 Oct, 2011, at 9:31 , Vick Ko wrote: > Thanks > > Looks like most of my duplicates are E39 and E60. > > But also looks like I have a stupid number of UV filters too. > > ...Vick > > > On 10/11/2011 6:50 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: >> I sold most of mine cheap to a worthy LUG M8 photog and gave away my last >> one (with damaged rim). >> Definitely not recommended to leave them on for wides. >> You might consider keeping one for very occasional use. IR is not 100% >> filtered with the M9 which I guess is actually the case with most (all?) >> dSLRs too. >> >> Cheers >> Geoff >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman Blog: http://www.nathansmusings.eu